🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously went for Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. However overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.